Name
ELO2 - Empathy That Matters: Evidence and a Practical Approach for Primary Care
Date & Time
Thursday, October 8, 2026, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM
Location Name
Regency A (2nd Floor)
Description

This 90-minute session begins with a 30-minute review of findings from a multisite primary care study showing that patients who experienced higher clinician empathy reported better mental and physical health, with associations persisting over two years. These results underscore empathy as a valuable clinical skill with meaningful impact on patients’ outcomes. The remaining 60 minutes is an experiential workshop introducing a brief communication approach for demonstrating empathy: the “Ordinary and Unique” procedure. Through self-reflection, paired practice, and discussion, participants will strengthen their ability to offer concise empathic reflections while bridging differences in identities and lived experiences.

Session Type
ELO
Objective 1
Summarize findings from a large multisite primary care study showing an association between higher patient-reported clinician empathy and better patient-reported mental and physical health over two years.
Objective 2
Interpret the practical significance of the reported effect sizes (approximately 2–3 point differences in PROMIS mental and physical health) for clinical care and population-level outcomes.
Objective 3
Describe the “Ordinary and Unique” framework, including how distress can reflect both shared human experience (ordinary) and individual context (unique).
Content Reference 1

Mullin, D. J., Littenberg, B., and Rose, G. L. (2025). The Association Between Patient’s Experience of Empathy and Self-Reported Health Status in a Large Multisite Primary Care Trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 109414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.109414

Content Reference 2

Nembhard, I. M., David, G., Ezzeddine, I., Betts, D., and Radin, J. (2023). A systematic review of research on empathy in health care. Health Services Research, 58(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14016

Content Reference 3

Osch, M. van, Dulmen, S. van, Vliet, L. van, and Bensing, J. (2017). Specifying the effects of physician’s communication on patients’ outcomes: A randomised controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(8), 1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.009

Content Reference 4

Rakel, D. P., Hoeft, T. J., Barrett, B. P., Chewning, B. A., Craig, B. M., and Niu, M. (2009). Practitioner empathy and the duration of the common cold. Family Medicine, 41(7), 494–501.

Content Reference 5

Wang, Y., Wu, Q., Wang, Y., and Wang, P. (2022). The Effects of Physicians’ Communication and Empathy Ability on Physician–Patient Relationship from Physicians’ and Patients’ Perspectives. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 29(4), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1