Instructions for Proposal Reviewers

Proposal Reviews are an important component in planning the CFHA Annual Conference. The Conference Co-chairs will consider your ratings and comments to ultimately decide which sessions are presented at the Conference.

Each Review Team has been assigned a set of proposals to be reviewed. For example, Review Team A will review sessions in Track A.

Reviewer Deadline: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 9 AM ET

All reviewer responses must be submitted through the online portal here.

 

Each proposal must be rated in four primary areas – IMPORTANCE, INNOVATION/ORIGINALITY, CLARITY/ORGANIZATION, and INTERACTIVE FORMAT. Please rate according to the following scale:

     5 stars - Outstanding with no noted weaknesses
     4 stars - Very strong with only one or two minor weaknesses
     3 stars - Good with several minor weaknesses
     2 stars - Fair with many minor or one or two major weaknesses
     1 stars - Unacceptable with many major weaknesses

The online Review Form contains seven (7) sections:

 

Please enter your first and last name on the online form.

Include the title when entering your responses online. This allows us to double-check that the review is connected to the right submission. You can copy and paste it.

There are three yes/no questions in this section.

  • Does the proposal show evidence of interdisciplinary collaboration?
  • Is the proposal clearly connected to empirical evidence?
  • Does the proposal show evidence of family centered approaches to care?

IMPORTANCE: The proposal is:

  • Consistent with the mission of CFHA to support healthcare professionals in integrating physical and behavioral health.
  • Likely to draw high interest from conference attendees.
  • Addresses the conference theme of "Breaking Boundaries: Redefining Access & Expansion in Integrated Care"

INNOVATION / ORIGINALITY: The proposal is:

  • Innovative and unique in its topic and timely in its subject matter.
  • Presenting data, outcomes or lessons based on original research or evaluation work.

CLARITY / ORGANIZATION: The proposal is:

  • Clear and well-organized in its rationale, presentation description and learning objectives; and
  • These are written in clear and concise language to help generate interest for the presentation.

INTERACTIVE FORMAT: The proposal is designed to encourage creative interactions with the audience that are of appropriate length and support the stated objectives.

You will be asked to make a final recommendation whether the proposal submission should be accepted for presentation at the 2025 Conference.

Please include your recommendation for presentation length and format. Be sure to review the preferred and the minimum presentation length (30 or 60 minutes). Please take into account the requested presentation length, alternative formats/lengths that would or would not be acceptable to the presenter, and the content of the presentation (importance/audience appeal) in offering your recommendation. Presentation length recommendation:

  • 30 minutes
  • 60 minutes
  • Discussion group (roundtable)
  • Poster

Please include comments or suggestions for further consideration, especially with regard to your recommendations for presentation format and length. These remarks will be very helpful for the selection committee in the decision-making process.

For reviewers who would like a quick tutorial on how to review an abstract of any type, the CFHA Research and Evaluation Committee wanted to share this webinar that was done a few years ago, but still provides a great tutorial on how to approach the process.

It is available publicly on Youtube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hsCpOavLGs.

If you have questions regarding the proposal review process, please contact Jackie Poor Hahn at jhahn@CFHA.net

 

All reviewer responses must be submitted through the online portal click here.